Can the Franchisor insist that the Franchisee sign and return Franchise documents within a limited time frame to avoid Franchisees sitting on documents and shopping around for a more attractive option?
Answered by Robert Toth from Wisewould Mahony - Franchise Lawyers
Under the Code of Conduct franchisors are required to provide prospective franchisees with a copy of the code, a disclosure document and a copy of the franchise agreement at least 14 days before the prospective franchisee enters into the franchise agreement or makes a non-refundable payment to the franchisor or its associates in connection with the proposed franchise agreement.
The 14 day disclosure period is a minimum requirement. The franchisee may take much longer than 14 days to obtain independent advice and make a decision whether or not they wish to proceed.
In providing the prospective franchisee with a franchise agreement, the franchisor is making the franchisee an offer. The franchisor can therefore make the offer conditional upon the franchisee accepting the offer within a specific timeframe (not less than 14 days) if the franchisor wants to put a timeline on the franchisee to commit. There is a risk that some franchisees may react negatively to such a deadline and therefore decide not to proceed. The franchisor needs to consider whether this risk outweighs the potential benefit of having franchisees commit to the franchise within a much shorter timeframe than may otherwise be the case.
The 14 day disclosure period is a minimum requirement. The franchisee may take much longer than 14 days to obtain independent advice and make a decision whether or not they wish to proceed.
In providing the prospective franchisee with a franchise agreement, the franchisor is making the franchisee an offer. The franchisor can therefore make the offer conditional upon the franchisee accepting the offer within a specific timeframe (not less than 14 days) if the franchisor wants to put a timeline on the franchisee to commit. There is a risk that some franchisees may react negatively to such a deadline and therefore decide not to proceed. The franchisor needs to consider whether this risk outweighs the potential benefit of having franchisees commit to the franchise within a much shorter timeframe than may otherwise be the case.
About Robert Toth
Robert Toth is the Franchise Partner at Wisewould Mahony - Franchise Lawyers. Robert Toth is an Accredited Business Law Specialist, a member of the International Franchise Lawyers Association (IFLA), a member of the Australian Institute of Company Directors.
You should always check independently that an ask an expert answer published on Franchise Business applies to your particular circumstances.
More Legal Advice from Robert Toth
I’m looking at purchasing a Franchise. Can I contact existing Franchisees to find out what they think of the Franchisor and the Franchise system?
The importance of research before taking on board a franchise ...
Should I buy a Franchise in my own individual name or through a company or trust?
When considering this question it is important to seek the appropriate ...
Why can’t I sue the Franchisor? – An insight into your franchisee’s rights and interests when attempting to exit your system.
For a variety of reasons Franchisees may have become disillusioned ...
As a Franchisor, can I force Franchisees to buy products from me, or from a particular third party supplier?
It is important to know your legal obligations before requiring ...
Contact Wisewould Mahony - Franchise Lawyers
Tel: 1300 421 405




