Find a Franchise
Franchise Advice

 

Targeting the masses – clever marketing or just spam?

As electronic marketing increasingly supersedes traditional communication methods, businesses must be wary of the line between marketing and spam – or face substantial fines.

The Spam Act 2003 imposes strict parameters on commercial use of email and other electronic messaging methods. Enforced by the Australian Communications Authority (ACA), the Act has given rise to major court proceedings such as The Australian Communications and Media Authority v Clarity1 Pty Ltd in late 2006. Clarity 1 sent an estimated 270, 305, 474 messages which resulted in 79 complaints from receivers. The result? The Company was ordered to pay $4.5 million and the Director an additional $1 million in damages.

So what constitutes Spam?

Spam consists of an “Electronic Message” that is commercial in nature: as such even a single message may be constituted as Spam.

Under the Spam Act, businesses must ensure they follow the following minimum guidelines:

Consent

Messages may only be sent when there is either express or implied consent from the receiving party.  Implied consent may be inferred when there is an existing business arrangement with the receiver, where the receivers’ contact details are published in the public realm or when they have provided a business card or other information releasing their details.

Identity

The email or message sent should contain clear and accurate information as to the sender’s identification.  The contact information in the message needs to be valid for a period of 30 days after the message is sent.

Unsubscribe

A message must contain a functional unsubscribe facility so the sender has the option to opt out of receiving any future correspondence.  This function must also remain active for a period of 30 days.

In enforcing the Spam Act, the ACA may take action ranging from issuing a warning notice to imposing maximum penalties of up to $220,000 ($44,000 for individuals) for the first contravention for a single day. Repeat offenders will be dealt with harshly, facing a fine of up to $1.1 million per day (or $220,000 for individuals).

As electronic marketing becomes more common and consumers are bombarded with messages, they are likely to hit the delete button before reading any content. As such, to make marketing efforts both worthwhile and legally compliant, it is essential that recipients are both properly qualified and willing to receive the message.

 

27-Aug-2008

Contact DC Strategy :
(all fields are mandatory)

Store my details for future Quick requests
Keep me informed of other related opportunities


More DC Strategy franchise articles

  • Shopping round for franchisors is widespread (19-Sep-2008)
    ...recent survey, carried out by DC Strategy – the region’s premier franchise consultant specialist in conjunction with www.franchisebusiness.com.au , reveals that nearly half of all potential franchisees meet with 3-6 franchisors...
  • Franchise Advisory Councils (19-Sep-2008)
    ...Participants should be chosen for their commercial savvy and ability to keep personal political motivations separate.DC Strategy is the region’s premier franchising specialist with an experienced and respected team of specialist franchise...
  • Is a franchisor obligated to renew a lease prior to the completion of a sale of an existing franchise? (18-Sep-2008)
    ...a recent DC Strategy case, the question as to how soon a franchisor must enter into a new lease or commence negotiations, in particular when there is uncertainty as to the lease being renewed was examined. It became evident in these...
  • Franchise Contract stability- the effect of “Ketchell’s case” (18-Sep-2008)
    ...definitive understanding of the circumstances in which a franchise agreement will be upheld by Australian Courts. DC Strategy is the region’s premier franchising specialist with an experienced and respected team of specialist franchise...
  • Recent Developments in NSW Real Estate law (27-Aug-2008)
    ...The Office of Fair Trading NSW (OFT) recently released a report on the level of regulation in the real estate industry to address the key issue of consumer vulnerability.  What are the implications of this report for business, consumers and...

More Legal Services articles

  • Why can’t I sue the Franchisor? – Exit Strategy (5-Nov-2008)
    ...There are many successful Franchise systems that operate responsibly and support their Franchisees.  The Franchisors have invested in their business, staff training, research and development and look to ways to improve their system for the...
  • Life after Ketchell: Still a Lesson for Franchisors (5-Nov-2008)
    ...Ketchell (Master Education Services Pty Limited v Ketchell [2008] HCA 38) was recently subject to a successful appeal to the High Court of Australia. All Franchisors would be aware of the significance of the case.  The High Court decision is...
  • International Franchisors Inbound (5-Nov-2008)
    ...Franchising has developed in Australia through well known international brands.  Foreign Franchisors are looking to Australia and New Zealand as potential markets to expand their brand. A number of foreign Franchisors have now successfully...
  • Partnerships: How to protect yourself (30-Oct-2008)
    ...You may have your own house in order and may be able to meet your liabilities, but what happens if your business partners are in financial trouble? There are things you can do to ensure that you do not suffer significant losses.When an individual...
  • Is exclusion the answer? (8-Oct-2008)
    ...However, anecdotally, the CISG has not yet been broadly adopted by Australian businesses as an acceptable basis on which to conclude contracts for the international sale of goods.It is common to see a complete exclusion of the CISG in...
1156 franchises listed